在调用存储过程中，就会涉及到表锁，行锁这一概念：所谓区别：有索引的时候就是行锁，没有索引的时候就是表索。
innodb 的行锁是在有索引的情况下,没有索引的表是锁定全表的.
表锁演示（无索引）
Session1:
mysql> set autocommit=0;
mysql> select * from innodb_test;
+------+-------------+
| id | name |
+------+-------------+
| 1 | woshiceshi |
| 2 | woshiceshi2 |
| 3 | woshiceshi3 |
+------+-------------+
mysql> select * from innodb_test where id = 2 for update;
+------+------------+
| id | name |
+------+------------+
| 2 | woshiceshi2 |
+------+------------+
Session2:
mysql> update innodb_test set name='sjis' where id = 1 ;
处于等待状态....
再回到session1 commit以后，session2就出来结果了（锁定了8秒，过了8秒左右才去session1提交）。
mysql> update innodb_test set name='sjis' where id = 1 ;
Query OK, 1 row affected (8.11 sec)
Rows matched: 1 Changed: 1 Warnings: 0
实验结果是：我在session1的for update 操作看似只锁定ID为2的行其实锁定了全表，以至于后面session2的对ID为1的行update 需要等待Session1锁的释放。
行锁演示（索引为ID）
Session1:
mysql> alter table innodb_test add index idx_id(id);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
mysql> select * from innodb_test where id = 2 for update;
+------+------------+
| id | name |
+------+------------+
| 2 | woshiceshi2 |
+------+------------+
Session2:
mysql> update innodb_test set name='wohaishiceshi' where id = 1 ;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
Rows matched: 1 Changed: 1 Warnings: 0
mysql> select * from innodb_test where id = 1;
+------+---------------+
| id | name |
+------+---------------+
| 1 | wohaishiceshi |
+------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
实验结果:这次的锁定是锁定的行，所以没有被锁定的行（ID不为2的行）可以进行update..
http://keshion.iteye.com/category/125242
